Respuesta :
Answer:
I would argue Pathos.
Explanation:
I would do process of elimination. Let's first look at logos. It doesn't really follow any logic. Let's next look at ethos. This one is a bit more promising, as you can argue that the government, or prison is an authority, but I would go with pathos, the appeal to emotion. There are two sides here; one is arguing that people who pollute should go to prison, and since people don't want to go to prison, it provokes an emotional response. Furthermore, prisons have negative connotations, so it could evoke a negative response within the reader that links prisons with pollution.
Hope this helps!
The given argument relating to pollution creates an emotional appeal, that is, pathos.
What were persuasive appeals?
Persuasive appeals were the kinds of argumentative appeals given by Aristotle in ancient times. They were of three types namely, Logos, Pathos, and Ethos.
- Pathos was one type of persuasive appeal which usually triggers the emotions of people or the readers. The advertisements given by companies on electronic media are one example of it.
- In the provided argument, pollution is applied as a trigger to create a terror of emotion among people for getting into the prison.
Therefore, pathos, that is, an emotional appeal has been applied to the stated argument.
Learn more about the persuasive appeals in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/20998569
#SPJ2