Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?

Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters.
Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
Tennessee had refused to create districts that were the same shape.
Tennessee had refused to take part in the national census.

Respuesta :

Answer:

B

Explanation:

took the test

The US Supreme Court ruled against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr because: the US Supreme Court ruled against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr.

Baker v. Carr was a case that culminated in a landmark ruling that held that redistricting was justiciable. This implied that the Fourteenth Amendment could be applied in such cases.

The state of Tennessee had not conducted redistricting since 1901 because they believed that redistricting was nonjusticiable.

The supreme court overruled this stance in their 1962 landmark ruling.

Learn more about Baker v. Carr here:

https://brainly.com/question/2407362