contestada

Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs

Identify the logical fallacy demonstrated in each attempt

1) Driving to work instead of using public transportation is like not eating everything on your plate. It wastes valuable resources.

2) Increasing our city's debt to improve our roads is better than letting all our cars be destroyed because of all the pot holes

3) Our current mayor has been in politics for over 25 years. It is time that we have a younger mayor, so we can have fresh ideas to make our city better

4) It is true that the city council did not approve a tax for a new road construction project. However, our city needs to attract more business to stabilize our economy.

Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs Identify the logical fallacy demonstrated in each attempt 1 Driving to work instead of using public tr class=

Respuesta :

janegrah2290
3 is an Ad Hominem ( it means against the man in latin ). It seems like 4 is the red herring because the second sentence is being used as a distraction. 1 seems to be false analogy. And that leaves 2 to be false dilemma. Though 1 and 2 seem to be interchangeable to me :/ Hope this helps!

Otras preguntas